🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our kids' youth". The policy may be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on lawmakers to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory motion demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," commented one MEP behind the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, interest built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after viewing dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to build tools that are safe and suitable for young users," said a leading child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily happening at the regional level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures demanding guardian approval for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from some politicians to mimic this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, global agencies strike a more measured position. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve user protection.

As this international discussion continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are less and less willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.